FROM A CONCERT TO AN EXIT:EUROPE’S MANY FACES

Brexit is old news and I do not wish to indulge in details tracing the events that led to the foundation of this geo-political establishment. Many of you may well be aware of the complexities of this economic and social union.

What I do wish to highlight upon, albeit briefly, are the factors that created an ‘exit atmosphere’. Rising immigrations, red tape-ism within the EU, the financial and economic burdens that the EU imposed upon the UK, strict regulations are some of the many arguments cited by the British to leave this historic organisation.

While these factors impinged upon the daily life of those who voted to leave, the Brexit also, exposes the many frictions that lie within Europe; frictions that have been at play for millennia now, have changed the map of Europe several times, and all this much before the idea of a European Union was even remotely conceived.

This discord is not a recent one and goes well back in time. For now, let’s affix 1789 as the year, which was to become a paradigm shift in Europe’s history. It was the year when the French revolted against monarchial absolutism and fought for their social and democratic rights.

The glory was ephemeral as France came under the shadows of Napoléon Bonaparte, who initiated an era of battles and wars. Dominating the years of 1803-1815, the Napoleonic Wars, fought between France and other European countries, changed the map of Europe. In the wake of the Napoleonic Wars, it was found imperative to devise a diplomatic policy that ended this decade long conflict and maintained peace.

And thus came about a ‘Concert’ that was to see the beginnings of all diplomacy in Europe. Termed as the ‘Concert of Europe’, a Supreme Council, consisting of Great Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia, was formulated in order to prevent any further aggressions from the French. Being an innovative political experiment, the Concert of Europe called for a series of conferences and congresses to deliberate upon the welfare of Europe.

Mutual jealousies within Europe were to see the end of this Concert. The Concert and the injustices that it carried, led to the Unification of Italy and Germany, which until now were divided into several confederacies; the movements yet again altering the face of Europe.

As these dissensions within Europe became more apparent, Bismarck, the face of German Unification, shrewd diplomat and statesman foresaw a war, which was unprecedented. He thereby forged alliances with Austria and Russia to form the Three Emperor’s League, and the Triple Alliance with Italy and Austria.

This system of forging military alliances was to mark a new trend in Europe’s diplomatic policy. These alliances, which according to Bismarck were an expression of common interest, also served the purpose of safeguarding oneself in times of diplomatic unease and anxiety. In the wake of this proliferating acrimony, Europe became divided into two major armed camps, known as the Triple Entente, represented by the English, French and the Russians and the Triple Alliance, formulated between the Austria, Germany and Italy.

While alliances and understandings were being established between European powers, empires were crumbling, and the map of Europe continuously changing. The empire in question being that of the Turks, the disintegration of which led to the dissemination of Balkan states such as Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro.

An uneasy calm prevailed over Europe, until the morning of 28th June, 1914 when an Austrian heir to the throne was shot dead along with his wife. And there began a summer of war; unprecedented in nature, a rarity that the world would witness for the first time.

Witnessing a colossal participation of the armed forces from around the world, and killing millions, the IWW ended with a treaty and a league. The League of Nations, as it was called, functioned more or less on the lines of the Concert, with the aim of maintaining peace and preventing any such bloody calamities. It quite evidently failed, for two decades of peace only gave way to the rise of extremist ideologies in Europe, once again pitting several European powers against one another and resulting in yet another war, fought between 1939-1945.

The outcome of this war was another organisation, with an international stature. The aftermath of the II WW also saw the beginnings of the European Union, with the intention of creating an economic dependence and binding between these countries.

However, the United Nations, as the international organisation was called, could not curtail the descent of an Iron Curtain, which created a strong divide between a Communist Soviet Union and the rest of Europe. The period stretching from 1945 till the late 1980s, when the Soviet Union disbanded giving rise to many independent European nations, came to be known as the Cold War.

In this context, the Brexit seems like a part of a political and historical process that is continuous and has been driving Europe for over centuries now. It only, once again, displays longstanding misunderstandings and distrust that have existed within Europe’s corridors of power. Only this time, the distrust was expressed through a referendum and not war.

Europe’s geo-political situation now looks uncertain. Perhaps, it’s best that two dynamic women decide the future course of action and give Europe yet another face(lift)!

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s